<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wordpress.com and the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogsavvy.net/archives/wordpresscom-and-the-future-63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogsavvy.net/archives/wordpresscom-and-the-future-63/</link>
	<description>Professional Blogging: 100's of free tips on how to make money with blogs, monitization, build traffic, build a bussiness online with us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.blogsavvy.net/archives/wordpresscom-and-the-future-63/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsavvy.net/wordpresscom-and-the-future#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Well, one quick remark.  I can understand the motivation behind invite-only services.  How do you maintain quality and defeat spam with a free service?  There has to be some barrier.

However, I should note that I like anonymity.  This thing you have going with edublogs is great.  I can just sign up and do it.  I don&#039;t have to be approved by some snob or somehow prove my worth.  After that, I&#039;m up for pay services.  Final choice, must-be-approved-by-someone services and then only if it is really worth it.  I find those almost invariably fail because they do not get the critical mass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, one quick remark.  I can understand the motivation behind invite-only services.  How do you maintain quality and defeat spam with a free service?  There has to be some barrier.</p>
<p>However, I should note that I like anonymity.  This thing you have going with edublogs is great.  I can just sign up and do it.  I don&#8217;t have to be approved by some snob or somehow prove my worth.  After that, I&#8217;m up for pay services.  Final choice, must-be-approved-by-someone services and then only if it is really worth it.  I find those almost invariably fail because they do not get the critical mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lelia Katherine Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.blogsavvy.net/archives/wordpresscom-and-the-future-63/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Lelia Katherine Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsavvy.net/wordpresscom-and-the-future#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Usually I have a lot to say (I&#039;m wordy like that), but I don&#039;t have much this time other than to say anyone who thinks this is an &#039;old idea&#039; hasn&#039;t used WordPress. WordPress isn&#039;t like other content management systems; you have so much more control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually I have a lot to say (I&#8217;m wordy like that), but I don&#8217;t have much this time other than to say anyone who thinks this is an &#8216;old idea&#8217; hasn&#8217;t used WordPress. WordPress isn&#8217;t like other content management systems; you have so much more control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

